[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4...
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4... |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Nov 2002 09:02:01 +0100 |
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:05:29 +0200 (IST), Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> IMHO, it doesn't make sense to feature-freeze the trunk unless we decide
> not to release from the branch anymore. Since there was a decision to
> release 21.3 from the branch, the decision not to feature-freeze followed
> almost automatically.
OK, but then, as soon as 21.3 hits the streets, we *should* create a new
release branch, feature-freeze it and start pretesting it. If we want a
shinny new-features release sometime before 2004, I mean. And it's my
*strong* believe we should want it. Like it or not, users and developers
are more attracted if it seems there's movement. I'd bet people out
there things Emacs development is glacial.
> For 21.3, maybe. But for 21.2, I disagree. You effectively suggest to
> eliminate bugfix releases, which I think would be wrong: users will have
> no stable versions to rely upon.
I cannot talk on behalf of Steffan, but at least I, who started the
thread, *don't* suggest such a thing. I suggest schedules.
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., (continued)
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Karl Eichwalder, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Karl Eichwalder, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Karl Eichwalder, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/08
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Richard Stallman, 2002/11/07
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4...,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Kai Großjohann, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Stefan Monnier, 2002/11/05
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Kim F. Storm, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Eli Zaretskii, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Juanma Barranquero, 2002/11/06
- Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4..., Miles Bader, 2002/11/06