[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: rcs2log]
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: rcs2log] |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:41:51 +0100 |
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:10:44 +0200 (IST), Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> So I don't see anything especially fragile here.
Well, I do. Anyway, when I say "fragile" I'm thinking more in the fact
that the detection method works for relatively stable environments. I
often modify my PATH and also quite often I have several CMD sessions
open with different PATHs. I'd much prefer to configure a variable (be
that an Emacs variable or an environment variable) and have it set up
forever.
Still, you say:
> ??? I suggested to do this as part of the rcs2log script itself. So PATH
> changes will be noted the next time the script runs, and acted upon at
> that very moment.
Detecting which sort is the correct one *every* time rcs2log runs seems
weird to me.
And still holds true what I've said: we have quite a few -program
variables for very similar reasons. sql-mode doesn't do any detecting
'round to find if I have sqlplus.exe or plus80.exe or whatever.
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Dr Francis J. Wright, 2002/10/30
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Dr Francis J. Wright, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Dr Francis J. Wright, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Juanma Barranquero, 2002/10/30
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/30
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log],
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Richard Stallman, 2002/10/31
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Richard Stallman, 2002/10/30