[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: rcs2log]
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: rcs2log] |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:40:14 -0500 |
> Why do you want to rename rcs2log to rcs2log.sh? That seems to me to make
> the Windows installation more non-standard than necessary.
I just assumed that if rcs2log stays as it is, it might be run
instead of rcs2log.bat. Whereas adding a .sh makes sure it won't
be considered as an executable, so rcs2log.bat will be run instead.
I agree that if it's not necessary, there's no point in making that
change.
Stefan
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Dr Francis J. Wright, 2002/10/30
- Message not available
- Re: rcs2log.bat, Dr Francis J. Wright, 2002/10/30
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Dr Francis J. Wright, 2002/10/30
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Dr Francis J. Wright, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log],
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Dr Francis J. Wright, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/29
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Juanma Barranquero, 2002/10/30
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/10/30
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Juanma Barranquero, 2002/10/30
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Richard Stallman, 2002/10/31
- Re: address@hidden: rcs2log], Richard Stallman, 2002/10/30