[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent |
Date: |
30 Oct 2002 11:22:05 +0900 |
Francesco Potorti` <address@hidden> writes:
> > dumb -- a `-flag' suffix doesn't really add any useful information
>
> I disagree. It makes it immediately clear that it is a boolean variable
> or such. Very useful, in my opinion.
Please see my reply to Richard about this.
Thanks,
-Miles
--
Fast, small, soon; pick any 2.
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), (continued)
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Henrik Enberg, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Richard Stallman, 2002/10/29
- Re: checkdoc (was: mh-e 6.2 imminent), Miles Bader, 2002/10/29
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Miles Bader, 2002/10/25
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/10/29
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Peter S Galbraith, 2002/10/29
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/30
- Re: mh-e 6.2 imminent,
Miles Bader <=