[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: while-no-input
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: while-no-input |
Date: |
25 Oct 2002 11:19:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> IIRC, RMS said that using signal like that was very unclean and using
> throw
> would be cleaner.
>
> That is the first thing I said. Afterwards I agreed to a modified
> version of the change which avoids the ugliness at the Lisp level.
True, but as I read Stefan's comments, removing the ugliness at the
Lisp level comes at the expense of increased ugliness and decreased
functional correctness at the C level.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: while-no-input, (continued)
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/04
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/04
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/05
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/23
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/24
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/24
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
- Re: while-no-input,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/25
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/29
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/31
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/31
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/05