[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: while-no-input
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: while-no-input |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Oct 2002 11:59:09 -0400 |
> But that's the case that I'm bumping up against.
> And the solution is pretty simple and localized as I have shown.
> The change is very ugly; too much to be justified by the intended goal.
Could you explain what part you find ugly ?
> However, it would cleaner if instead of generating a quit signal it
> did a throw to a specified tag.
The reason I didn't do that is that it didn't seem necessary
and that I didn't want the QUIT macro to grow, but I could introduce
a new function `quit' that the QUIT macro could call and which would
either call `Fsignal (Qquit, Qnil)' ot `Fthrow (...)'.
Stefan
- while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/01
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/02
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/02
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/04
- Re: while-no-input,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/05
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/23
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/24
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/24
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/25
- Re: while-no-input, Kim F. Storm, 2002/10/25
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/25
- Re: while-no-input, Richard Stallman, 2002/10/26
- Re: while-no-input, Stefan Monnier, 2002/10/29