[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:29:46 -0700 (MST) |
OK, so syntax-ppss need to check for such a special return value
and when found, should pass it up to font-lock which should also check
for it and pass it up to jit-lock.
Why would that be better than using a non-local exit like `throw'
or `signal' ?
Using throw to report this condition might be ok. But not signal;
that is for reporting errors and things like errors. This is not an
error.
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, (continued)
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/15
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/15
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/16
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/16
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/17
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/17
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/17
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/17
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/18
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/18
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters,
Richard Stallman <=
- error - catch/throw (Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters), Karl Eichwalder, 2001/11/19