On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Roy Badami
<address@hidden> wrote:
On 23/12/2011 12:21, Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
Am Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011, 12:57:52 schrieb Georg Lutz:
But strong checksumming is not necessary here. It would be enough to
compare ctime instead of mtime.
better compare both
I don't think there's any need to compare both - the ctime should be updated by all operations that modify the inode in any way, so it shouldn't be possible to have the mtime change without the ctime also chaning.
--
Roy Badami
Roboreus Ltd
Third Floor
The Place
175 High Holborn
London WC1V 7AA