Re: [Duplicity-talk] changed files not being backed up

[Roy Badami]

On 23/12/2011 12:21, Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
> Am Freitag, 23. Dezember 2011, 12:57:52 schrieb Georg Lutz:
> > But strong checksumming is not necessary here. It would be enough to
> > compare ctime instead of mtime.
> better compare both
I don't think there's any need to compare both - the ctime should be 
updated by all operations that modify the inode in any way, so it 
shouldn't be possible to have the mtime change without the ctime also 
chaning.

--
Roy Badami
Roboreus Ltd
Third Floor
The Place
175 High Holborn
London WC1V 7AA