[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] zfec vs. par2 (and, hello there!)
From: |
Edgar Soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] zfec vs. par2 (and, hello there!) |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:21:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 |
> This is similar to why I had chosen to use afio instead of tar for my old
> backup system; it would compress each file individually instead of compress
> the stream coming out of the tarball... If you hit a bad spot on tape that
> could not be corrected, you lost a LOT less data.
>
> -A.
>
apart from the general design issue, duplicity works good as long as there is
no bitflipping / damaging to files, taking the current status quo a parity
recovery solution should create an amount of data on the encrypted files to
repair them in case of errors.
At least this is wat I imagine.
.. ede
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] zfec v s. par2 (and, hello there!) (was: Announcing D éjà Dup), Peter Schuller, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] zfec vs. par2 (and, hello there!) (was: Announcing Déjà Dup), zooko, 2008/11/03
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] zfec vs. par2 (and, hello there!), edgar . soldin, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] zfec vs. par2 (and, hello there!), zooko, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] zfec vs. par2 (and, hello there!), edgar . soldin, 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] zfec vs. par2 (and, hello there!), Andrew Kohlsmith (lists), 2008/11/04
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] zfec vs. par2 (and, hello there!),
Edgar Soldin <=