|
From: | Adam Megacz |
Subject: | [Duplicity-talk] are periodic full backups necessary? |
Date: | Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:02:28 -0800 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
I'm trying to get a good understanding of the tradeoffs between rdiff-backup and duplicity. One of the nice things about rdiff-backup is that the "most recent and backward diffs" means you never need to do a "full backup". What are the consequences of never doing a full backup with duplicity's "original and forward diffs" format? Will the time required for an incremental backup increase in proportion to how many incrementals there have been since the last full backup? Or is the backup time independent of how "far back" the most recent full backup was? - a -- PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |