[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: bug or not: --archive-dir and full backup
|
From: |
Gabriel Ambuehl |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Re: bug or not: --archive-dir and full backup |
|
Date: |
Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:06:28 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070831.706792) |
On Monday 10 September 2007 11:02:01 Thomas Seliger wrote:
> Interesting what different people want from the --archive-dir option ;). So
> how is --archive-dir supposed to work?
Truth to be told, I never got it to do anything at all with 0.4.2 so I quit
bothering.
It would never place any signatures in --archive-dir=localPath.
I agree that it should be possible to have both locally cached signatures for
speed as well as remotely stored ones for safety.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.