[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?
From: |
Peter Schuller |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:20:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070501) |
> oh, yeah. i wasn't thinking of -reverting- it back. i am quite sure
> that's not an issue.
One problem with changing it *back* is that you inherently introduce a
race condition with other processes. If we allow for applications
depending on atime in non-obvious ways, the potential consequences of
atime moving *backwards* as opposed to unnecessarily forward could
potentially be worse.
--
/ Peter Schuller
PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <address@hidden>'
Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to address@hidden
E-Mail: address@hidden Web: http://www.scode.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?, Axel Beckert, 2007/06/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?, mike, 2007/06/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?, Axel Beckert, 2007/06/12
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?,
Peter Schuller <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?, Axel Beckert, 2007/06/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?, Charles Duffy, 2007/06/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?, Steven Willoughby, 2007/06/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?, Steven Willoughby, 2007/06/15
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Preventing access time modification?, Charles Duffy, 2007/06/15