[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 15-09-2002
From: |
S11001001 |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 15-09-2002 |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:27:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020913 |
Note on the earlier discussion of install-location: Perhaps the PE
executables, being, well, PE, should go in PREFIX/share/forum-x.x/, with
the symbolic link and whatnot. Here's the output of appropriate
variables to use in Makefile.am or Makefile.in, and their purposes:
--prefix=PREFIX install architecture-independent files in PREFIX
[/usr/local]
--exec-prefix=EPREFIX install architecture-dependent files in EPREFIX
[same as prefix]
--bindir=DIR user executables in DIR [EPREFIX/bin]
--sbindir=DIR system admin executables in DIR [EPREFIX/sbin]
--libexecdir=DIR program executables in DIR [EPREFIX/libexec]
--datadir=DIR read-only architecture-independent data in DIR
[PREFIX/share]
--sysconfdir=DIR read-only single-machine data in DIR [PREFIX/etc]
--sharedstatedir=DIR modifiable architecture-independent data in DIR
[PREFIX/com]
--localstatedir=DIR modifiable single-machine data in DIR
[PREFIX/var]
--libdir=DIR object code libraries in DIR [EPREFIX/lib]
--includedir=DIR C header files in DIR [PREFIX/include]
--oldincludedir=DIR C header files for non-gcc in DIR [/usr/include]
--infodir=DIR info documentation in DIR [PREFIX/info]
--mandir=DIR man documentation in DIR [PREFIX/man]
--
Stephen Compall
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
The "pirate" rhetoric is typically accepted because it blankets the
media so few people realize that it is radical. It is effective
because, if copying by the public is fundamentally illegitimate, we
can never object to the publishers' demand that we surrender our
freedom to do so. In other words, when the public is challenged to
show why publishers should not receive some additional power, the most
important reason of all--"We want to copy"--is disqualified in
advance.
-- RMS, "Misinterpreting Copyright--A Series of Errors"