[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001
|
From: |
Gopal . V |
|
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Forum Update 17-apr-2001 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:57:14 +0530 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:34:17PM +0200, Silvernerd wrote:
> I'm currently busy with writing texinfo documentation for the project,
> and have run in to the question what license (GPL+linking exception or
> plain GPL) the project should have.
What would be the license requirement for Plugins in this case ?. Will it
*require* GPL'd plugins .
Obviously such a program should be made up of component plugins ?.
Should plugins be GPL'd (ie this is a question in SEE/VRS too).
Gopal.V