Re: [DotGNU]Mono Project un-GPLs class libraries to court major tech companies

[Seth Johnson]

Note well:

Methinks that what motivates these companies' wish not to
work with the LGPL, is its possible inconsistency with
content control -- Microsoft's deliverable for the old world
publishers, part of the .NET plan in my very perspicacious
imagination.  They're just not saying it at this juncture,
and are instead (knowingly or not) playing a part in a M$
scheme to defame the GPL.

Seth Johnson


David Sugar wrote:
> 
> Certainly I see no reason why they could not have met their stated goals
> within the LGPL.  However, X is considered a valid free software
> license, albiet one that does not protect the freedom of the library
> itself.  I personally would not choose to use it.