[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Directory-discuss] entry for Stow in FSD
From: |
Andrew Engelbrecht |
Subject: |
Re: [Directory-discuss] entry for Stow in FSD |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:39:06 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15 |
On 12/14/2011 06:57 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> Adam, I'm puzzled by this. I never saw it (and still don't see it) on
> the review page, http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Category:Review. I try
> to keep my eye out there for new GNU updates.
>
> Andrew, can you figure out where Adam's update ended up?
Well, bug reports are in "Category:Bug_report":
http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Category:Bug_report
I was surprised when I originally stumbled upon that category, since bug
reports are in the "Review:" namespace, but not "Category:Review".
(Categories and namespaces are different ways of organizing things in
MediaWiki.) "Category:Review" is supposed to be for brand new entries,
while the "Category:Bug_report" is supposed to be for updated
information. While I'm at it, I might as well post the link to the
Workflow page, which lists some useful links and tips, including the
above link:
http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/FSD:Workflow
> (Also, Andrew, it occurs to me now that it would be useful for me if GNU
> packages were somehow marked as such on the Category:Review page, or
> there was a separate review page with just GNU packages. I try to
> undertake to update information for GNU packages when it comes in, but I
> can't take on non-GNU.)
I think that I might be able to do some trickery to get this to work.
I'll try to get it working by tomorrow if time allows.
-Andrew