[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Changing the way we use version numbers in Denemo
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Changing the way we use version numbers in Denemo |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Dec 2016 08:56:06 +0000 |
On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> An alternative would be to introduce an additional fourth number for the
> development versions, e.g. representing the date. For instance, a build
> from today would be 2.1.15.20161223.
That would involve changes in the C programming to determine if a new
version was an upgrade. And it would not give a neat solution for the
real (though slight) problem of exactly which was the last commit
included in the build - see my other email
>
> At the moment, I am setting the version of my builds by hand.
In which case, you could adopt the 2.0.x idea as in my other email,
where a literal "x" is used to mean one of the unstable series. You
would do the same amount of hand setting, just not giving the file a
specific micro number.
Richard