denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 2.0


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 2.0
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:22:37 +0100

OK, this should be fixed too, and as this was only reported at the link
stage it should be the last one...

Richard


On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 13:17 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I am still unable to compile the darwin version. Please see the
> denemo.log file.
> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> On Sep 10, 2015 10:05 AM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>         I've been a little quiet about the 2.0 release schedule. It is
>         for
>         purely personal reasons - I needed to get to grips with
>         beaming in
>         LilyPond, and so I have put the results of this work into the
>         release.
>         You can now set up the beaming rule you want by doing an
>         example by hand
>         selecting it, and invoking a command.
>          And just when I thought this was done, I realised that the
>         case I had
>         needed manual beaming, so I needed to find all the places
>         where it was
>         needed. So I've coded up a Search & Replace command, something
>         long in
>         the back of my mind, but needing a real life use-case.
>         How it works is that you make a selection and invoke
>         Navigation->Seek->Search Rhythmic Pattern (or Ctrl-f, Ctrl-f)
>         and this
>         searches for the same sequence of note-durations on the staff.
>         When
>         found you can stop to edit, or if you have the edit commands
>         recorded in
>         the Scheme window you can execute them and continue.
>         
>         Now, I *really* think it is time we moved to a release!
>         
>         Is a set of binaries possible now?
>         
>         Richard
>         
>         
>         On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 19:10 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
>         > I've tested
>         >
>         >
>         http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-mingw-0.0.0.zip
>         >
>         > which is a getting close to the final 2.0 version. Can other
>         windows
>         > users please test.
>         >
>         > Richard
>         >
>         >
>         > On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 13:13 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
>         > > I have built a new mingw binary.
>         > >
>         > > Jeremiah
>         > >
>         > > On Aug 26, 2015 4:00 AM, "Richard Shann"
>         <address@hidden>
>         > > wrote:
>         > >         I've now added Score, Movement, Staff and Voice
>         property
>         > >         editors to the
>         > >         Object editor, so that there is a consistent
>         interface to
>         > >         editing things
>         > >         that have been added to a score. The Staff
>         Property Editor
>         > >         gives access
>         > >         to directives added to time and keysignatures so
>         that all
>         > >         Denemo
>         > >         Directives now have a user-friendly interface for
>         editing them
>         > >         (provided
>         > >         the command creating them self-edits).
>         > >
>         > >         I've updated the manual to reflect these additions
>         - I think
>         > >         they
>         > >         constitute quite a change to Denemo use beyond the
>         stage of
>         > >         entering
>         > >         music - previously when a property was added to,
>         say, a key
>         > >         signature it
>         > >         was not easy to find out which command had been
>         invoked. Now
>         > >         you can get
>         > >         up the editor and find out and, reverse or modify
>         the effect
>         > >         if desired.
>         > >         There are still commands that do not self-edit but
>         once I have
>         > >         been
>         > >         through fixing those I think the result will merit
>         a change in
>         > >         the major
>         > >         version number - I propose this next version be
>         version 2.0
>         > >
>         > >         Any feedback on the new properties editors would
>         be most
>         > >         welcome (a new
>         > >         mingw binary would be helpful too for those poor
>         souls still
>         > >         sticking
>         > >         with windows).
>         > >
>         > >         Richard
>         > >
>         > >
>         > >
>         > >         _______________________________________________
>         > >         Denemo-devel mailing list
>         > >         address@hidden
>         > >
>          https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > Denemo-devel mailing list
>         > address@hidden
>         > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>         
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Denemo-devel mailing list
>         address@hidden
>         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]