[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 2.0
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo 2.0 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:22:37 +0100 |
OK, this should be fixed too, and as this was only reported at the link
stage it should be the last one...
Richard
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 13:17 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I am still unable to compile the darwin version. Please see the
> denemo.log file.
>
> Jeremiah
>
> On Sep 10, 2015 10:05 AM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> I've been a little quiet about the 2.0 release schedule. It is
> for
> purely personal reasons - I needed to get to grips with
> beaming in
> LilyPond, and so I have put the results of this work into the
> release.
> You can now set up the beaming rule you want by doing an
> example by hand
> selecting it, and invoking a command.
> And just when I thought this was done, I realised that the
> case I had
> needed manual beaming, so I needed to find all the places
> where it was
> needed. So I've coded up a Search & Replace command, something
> long in
> the back of my mind, but needing a real life use-case.
> How it works is that you make a selection and invoke
> Navigation->Seek->Search Rhythmic Pattern (or Ctrl-f, Ctrl-f)
> and this
> searches for the same sequence of note-durations on the staff.
> When
> found you can stop to edit, or if you have the edit commands
> recorded in
> the Scheme window you can execute them and continue.
>
> Now, I *really* think it is time we moved to a release!
>
> Is a set of binaries possible now?
>
> Richard
>
>
> On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 19:10 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > I've tested
> >
> >
> http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-mingw-0.0.0.zip
> >
> > which is a getting close to the final 2.0 version. Can other
> windows
> > users please test.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 13:13 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > > I have built a new mingw binary.
> > >
> > > Jeremiah
> > >
> > > On Aug 26, 2015 4:00 AM, "Richard Shann"
> <address@hidden>
> > > wrote:
> > > I've now added Score, Movement, Staff and Voice
> property
> > > editors to the
> > > Object editor, so that there is a consistent
> interface to
> > > editing things
> > > that have been added to a score. The Staff
> Property Editor
> > > gives access
> > > to directives added to time and keysignatures so
> that all
> > > Denemo
> > > Directives now have a user-friendly interface for
> editing them
> > > (provided
> > > the command creating them self-edits).
> > >
> > > I've updated the manual to reflect these additions
> - I think
> > > they
> > > constitute quite a change to Denemo use beyond the
> stage of
> > > entering
> > > music - previously when a property was added to,
> say, a key
> > > signature it
> > > was not easy to find out which command had been
> invoked. Now
> > > you can get
> > > up the editor and find out and, reverse or modify
> the effect
> > > if desired.
> > > There are still commands that do not self-edit but
> once I have
> > > been
> > > through fixing those I think the result will merit
> a change in
> > > the major
> > > version number - I propose this next version be
> version 2.0
> > >
> > > Any feedback on the new properties editors would
> be most
> > > welcome (a new
> > > mingw binary would be helpful too for those poor
> souls still
> > > sticking
> > > with windows).
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > >
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel