Re: [Cp-tools-discuss] DebugDoclet >> XmlDoclet

[Nic Ferrier]

Alex Lancaster <address@hidden> writes:

> I think it could be argued that GNOME is part of the GNU project and 
> that libxml/libxslt is part of GNOME, so we could have that
> covered. 

Except it's a C library isn't it?


> In any case, if we keep the toolchain for the current texinfo output 
> separate from the XML output (i.e. it wouldn't depend on the existence 
> of any XML/XSLT parser) then we are fitting in with the GNU project 
> because we are delivering docs in texinfo which is the GNU standard, 
> and anything extra is simply icing on the cake!  So texinfo would be 
> the "default" doclet in this scenario. 

Ok. I'd be happy with that.


Nic