[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs
From: |
Assaf Gordon |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2017 19:22:27 -0500 |
Hello Antonio,
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 18:43, Antonio Diaz Diaz <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Assaf Gordon wrote:
>> I do not have the expertise nor the time to examine the file format.
>> [...]
>> But Antonio is actively trying to convince people to use his program,
>> partly by sending emails repeatedly disparaging other programs.
>
> If you admit that you do not have the expertise to examine the (very simple)
> lzip file format, why do you describe as "disparaging" my findings about the
> (much more complex) xz format?
I could be wrong, but to the best of my understanding "disparaging" means
"expressing the opinion that something is of little worth".
And it seems your emails (to multiple mailing lists) express the opinion
that xz is inadequate. Isn't that the correct term ?
It does not imply your opinion on xz is incorrect, nor that lzip is worse or
better.
Put in context of the discussion,
what I meant is resending these emails (while factual as they are)
does not help to encourage people (or at least me) to adopt lzip.
regards,
- assaf
- [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Eric Blake, 2017/01/11
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Jim Meyering, 2017/01/11
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Assaf Gordon, 2017/01/11
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2017/01/11
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Assaf Gordon, 2017/01/12
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2017/01/12
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Assaf Gordon, 2017/01/12
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2017/01/13
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs,
Assaf Gordon <=
Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2017/01/11