[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs
From: |
Antonio Diaz Diaz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2017 01:53:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 |
Hello Eric,
Eric Blake wrote:
But these days, there are strong arguments for including .lzip
distributions, either in addition or in place of .xz:
http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/xz_inadequate.html
Thank you very much! You can't imagine how much this means to me. I
would have been happy to use lzma utils or xz if they had provided a
safe format, but sadly they didn't. I have been working for eight years
now to provide a well designed format for the wonderful LZMA algorithm
of Igor Pavlov, and I feel that coreutils using lzip opens the way for
all of us to finally enjoy the benefits of LZMA.
+This package uses XZ utils (successor to LZMA) and LXIP to create
s/LXIP/LZIP/
Best regards,
Antonio.
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Jim Meyering, 2017/01/11
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Assaf Gordon, 2017/01/11
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2017/01/11
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Assaf Gordon, 2017/01/12
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2017/01/12
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Assaf Gordon, 2017/01/12
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2017/01/13
- Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Assaf Gordon, 2017/01/13
Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs,
Antonio Diaz Diaz <=
Re: [PATCH] maint: RFC: add lzip tarballs, Matias A. Fonzo, 2017/01/12