[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:35:17 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 08/22/2012 10:05 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 03:00 PM, Ondrej Oprala wrote:
>> Hi, I haven't heard from this thread since I posted the last patch,
>> are there still things to correct or should I consider it closed?
>
> The --tag description in the texinfo is a bit sparse. It says:
>
> "If the file is not binary, put a leading whitespace before the algorithm's
> name."
>
> More accurately it could say:
>
> "When operating in @option{--text} mode, put a leading space before the
> algorithm's name.
> On @option{--text} mode significant systems, this enables compatibility with
> existing
> BSD (binary) checksums, while also allowing operating in @option{--text}
> mode".
>
> It's worth considering though, do we want to support --text mode
> at all with --tag? I.E. we could avoid the default leading space,
> and have --tag imply --binary and be mutually exclusive with --text?
I'm fine with --tag implying --binary. --text mode is almost always the
wrong thing to use, and it should have never been the default on
text-mode systems, nor should it be the default output (we're stuck with
that for normal output, where the presence of '*' to indicate binary
output, but only from systems where text mode differs, causes no end of
grief; but for BSD output we don't have to repeat the mistake).
>
> I'm 60:40 for having --tag imply --binary given the above.
I'm 90:10 for having --tag imply --binary.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/01
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/02
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/22
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/22
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/22
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/22
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/24
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/24