[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:05:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0 |
On 08/22/2012 03:00 PM, Ondrej Oprala wrote:
> Hi, I haven't heard from this thread since I posted the last patch,
> are there still things to correct or should I consider it closed?
The --tag description in the texinfo is a bit sparse. It says:
"If the file is not binary, put a leading whitespace before the algorithm's
name."
More accurately it could say:
"When operating in @option{--text} mode, put a leading space before the
algorithm's name.
On @option{--text} mode significant systems, this enables compatibility with
existing
BSD (binary) checksums, while also allowing operating in @option{--text} mode".
It's worth considering though, do we want to support --text mode
at all with --tag? I.E. we could avoid the default leading space,
and have --tag imply --binary and be mutually exclusive with --text?
On the other hand, having distinguished text/binary modes,
does allow you to portably verify arbitrary terminal input
in a concise way like:
md5sum -c <(echo ' MD5 (-) = c0710d6b4f15dfa88f600b0e6b624077') &&
echo "input matched"
The tag is a bit redundant in this use case though since
an explicit util would be used.
I'm 60:40 for having --tag imply --binary given the above.
cheers,
Pádraig.
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/01
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/02
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/22
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/22
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils,
Pádraig Brady <=
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Eric Blake, 2012/08/22
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/22
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Ondrej Oprala, 2012/08/23
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/24
- Re: RFE: hash-type in sum utils, Pádraig Brady, 2012/08/24