[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rethinking configuration tuples
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Rethinking configuration tuples |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2023 10:01:35 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
John Ericson <list@JohnEricson.me> writes:
> On 9/19/23 21:07, Po Lu wrote:
>
> Why not?
>
> I have on my hand several programs which use -winnt*, such as many old
> releases of Emacs. And users should be capable of replacing
> config.sub and config.guess with newer versions without ill effect.
>
> At no point has anyone proposed removing *-winnt-*. And while I think
> a deprecation message is a good idea, no one has submitted yet a patch
> for that either.
>
> With Dmitry's plan, you can still upgrade config.sub in those old
> versions of Emacs if you like without any issue.
Why should config.sub print anything at all? An extraneous message
constitutes ill effect.
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, (continued)
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, John Ericson, 2023/09/14
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, Po Lu, 2023/09/14
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, John Ericson, 2023/09/14
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, Po Lu, 2023/09/14
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, John Ericson, 2023/09/14
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, Po Lu, 2023/09/14
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, Dmitry V. Levin, 2023/09/19
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, John Ericson, 2023/09/19
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, Po Lu, 2023/09/19
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, John Ericson, 2023/09/19
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, Po Lu, 2023/09/11
- Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2023/09/10
- when are two platforms different triples?, Adam Joseph, 2023/09/12
Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, John Ericson, 2023/09/14
Re: Rethinking configuration tuples, Adam Joseph, 2023/09/12