Re: Rethinking configuration tuples

[John Ericson]

I had meant to just deal with windows-gnu in those 3 options, otherwise 
we have a combinatorial explosion of patches (and commit messages) for 
me to write :). Once we deal with that one we can deal with the others, 
right?

John

On 9/14/23 01:00, Po Lu wrote:
> John Ericson <list@JohnEricson.me> writes:
>
> > OK here we go:
> >
> > 1 https://github.com/ericson2314/gnu-config/commit/windows-mingnu.patch
> > 2 https://github.com/ericson2314/gnu-config/commit/windows-mingw.patch
> > 3 https://github.com/ericson2314/gnu-config/commit/no-windows-gnu.patch
> >
> > I tried to honestly argue for each of them the best I could in the commit 
> > message. I know I prefer (1); I am guessing Jacob prefers (2),
> > and Po Lu prefers (3).
> I prefer eliminating windows-msvc too.  It's also a misnomer, and we
> already have *-winnt*, which represents MSVC.