[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub
From: |
Ben Elliston |
Subject: |
Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 21:05:10 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:11:47AM +0100, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> The problem happens when I use `uname -p`-`uname -s` as --build=
> argument of a configure script while cross-compiling.
So use --build=`uname -p`-`uname -s | tr A-Z a-z`. ;-)
In my experience, in 99% of cases, people do not compute the value of
the --build argument.
Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/01
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Jan Engelhardt, 2013/02/02
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/02
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub,
Ben Elliston <=
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/02
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Ben Elliston, 2013/02/02
- Message not available
- Need for --build with --host when cross-compiling ?, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/03
- Re: Need for --build with --host when cross-compiling ?, Jan Engelhardt, 2013/02/05
- Re: Need for --build with --host when cross-compiling ?, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/12
- Re: Need for --build with --host when cross-compiling ?, Jan Engelhardt, 2013/02/12
- Message not available
- Uppercase in cross-compiler name, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/03
Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Ben Elliston, 2013/02/02