[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub
|
From: |
Ben Elliston |
|
Subject: |
Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub |
|
Date: |
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 20:08:02 +1100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:23:09PM +0100, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> With the current config.sub, I'm getting:
> $ ./config.sub X86-LINUX
> Invalid configuration `X86-LINUX': machine `X86' not recognized
Making config.sub case insensitive would be a departure from the
convention for Unix shell utilities (case sensitive). Hence, I am not
fond of this patch, but thank you anyway. Is there a particular
problem with MiNT you were trying to fix?
Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, (continued)
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Jan Engelhardt, 2013/02/02
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/02
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Ben Elliston, 2013/02/02
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/02
- Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub, Ben Elliston, 2013/02/02
- Message not available
- Need for --build with --host when cross-compiling ?, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/03
- Re: Need for --build with --host when cross-compiling ?, Jan Engelhardt, 2013/02/05
- Re: Need for --build with --host when cross-compiling ?, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/12
- Re: Need for --build with --host when cross-compiling ?, Jan Engelhardt, 2013/02/12
- Message not available
- Uppercase in cross-compiler name, Yann Droneaud, 2013/02/03
Re: Regarding my two patches against config.sub,
Ben Elliston <=