[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!
From: |
amigolang |
Subject: |
Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish! |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Jun 2017 19:08:47 +0200 |
Hello Werner, hello Hin-Tak,
I tried out pst-pdf. In the attached file pst-pdf.tar.gz you find the three files
ps4pdfnmt.batch
psf-demo.es
pst-pdf-example1.tex
If you rename ps4pdfnmt.batch to ps4pdfnmt.bat, you have the three files I used for the test.
They are shipped as example files with pst-pdf, I just altered the batch file a bit, so that it worked for me, and reduced the *.tex file to become a minimum working example.
If in a directory with those three files under Win7 and Texlive2016 you call
ps4pdfnmt pst-pdf-example1.tex
it shold produce a graphic with psfrag insertations.
If in ps4pdfnmt.bat in line 50 you exchange pdflatex against either lualatex or xelatex, the run breaks. So pst-pdf as well works with neither lualatex nor xelatex.
As auto-pst-pdf is just a wrapper around pst-pdf, it will not work either.
That now means:
Working under Windows with psfrag, I can use neither xelatex nor lualatex with one of the packages pdfrack, pstool, pst-pdf or auto-pst-pdf.
As I know of no other package to get psfrag work with, that means, psfrag apparently doesn't work with either lualatex or xetex...
With other words:
* I can work with LaTeX only or
* with LaTeX in a first run and PdfLaTeX in a second run.
The first approach still seems easier to me... but both don't work in the moment...
Thorsten
Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet.
pst-pdf.tar.gz
Description: null
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, (continued)
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/07
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/07
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/09
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!,
amigolang <=