[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!
From: |
Hin-Tak Leung |
Subject: |
Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish! |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jun 2017 14:53:17 +0000 (UTC) |
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 8/6/17, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> The `missing glyphs' are glyph variants.
Usually, glyph X is, say,
the Japanese
variant, while X+1 is the Taiwanese one, etc., etc.
Argh, I see. cmap (3,10) have about 400 pairs of unicode points maps to the
same glyph. The re-encoding process is likely dropping one of them. It would
make sense to duplicate or share a link...
> Maybe the bug can be circumvented by adjusting
the .pe script so that
it temporarily
removes all glyphs that don't have a cmap mapping?
I
haven't the fontforge docs whether
this is possible...
It probably is. I see that after reencoding, I have about 49000 characters (up
from 43000), so about 6000 unicode points are being trashed.
I am in the middle of changing stuff in both fontforge and the subfont script
at the moment. ttf2tfm has a easier task: it just needs to point to the right
glyph, so sharing a glyph between two code points is less an issue, compared to
the case with a font editor.
- [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/02
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/03
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/03
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/07
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/07
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/07
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!,
Hin-Tak Leung <=
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/09
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/09