Re: Actor model implementation, seeking feedback

[Ariela Wenner]

Hi, Théo!

What I did is really the bare minimum to send and receive messages via req-rep
sockets, feel free to grab that if it is of any use to you. I've been thinking
about working on full-fledged bindings for nng, unfortunately I don't feel like
I have enough experience with the library to do so right now. Maybe in the
future :)

I've actually made a soft fork and stripped encryption, serialization and nng
(instead I used mailbox and a global "registry" to keep track of all actors) to
play around with just that idea! It definitely seemed to perform better. I might
upload that sometime.

Cheers!

On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 10:59:57 +0200
Théo Cavignac <theo.cavignac@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi ! That's cool, actor model is very useful !
> 
> Also nng is soo cool, that would be fantastic if you could extract a 
> standalone binding egg from your work !
> 
> How does your implementation perform in purely local single process 
> environment where serialization and encryption are not required ?
> 
> Cheers !
> 
> Théo
> 
> Le 26/06/2021 à 17:38, Ariela Wenner a écrit :
>