[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses
From: |
noosphere |
Subject: |
Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 2020 09:23:55 -0800 |
On Sun 22 Nov 2020 09:15:46 AM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:40:21 -0800 <noosphere@mailc.net> wrote:
>>
>> Should we keep this documentation?
>
> I think it should be removed.
Done.
>> If SRFI-87 is not an egg and if there's no explicit support of SRFI-87
>> in chicken, how was I able to (import srfi-87) and uninstall it, and why
>> couldn't I reinstall it?
>
> You could import it because you had a srfi-87 module installed on your
> system (probably your own egg).
>
> Regarding not being able to install it, did you call chicken-install
> from the directory with the sources of your egg? If you didn't, that's
> expected to fail, as the egg has not been added to our egg servers.
That's why I was surprised it was installed to begin with, since I'm
pretty sure I didn't install it from within my egg directory, but I
guess I must have if it's not part of Chicken and there's no such egg on
the servers.
--Sergey
- New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, noosphere, 2020/11/20
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2020/11/21
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, noosphere, 2020/11/21
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, Lassi Kortela, 2020/11/21
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2020/11/21
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, noosphere, 2020/11/21
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2020/11/22
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, John Cowan, 2020/11/22
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses,
noosphere <=