[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Nov 2020 21:28:10 +0100 |
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 08:18:54 -0800 <noosphere@mailc.net> wrote:
> On Sat 21 Nov 2020 12:14:29 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks. I'm afraid SRFI-87 is already supported by CHICKEN core, isn't
>> it? Am I missing something?
>
> Hmm... it wasn't listed on the Supported Standards page[1]
>
> megane in #chicken alsays said:
>
> "yep, there's => support for case in core already"
>
> If I knew this SRFI was already supported, I wouldn't have bothered
> packaging it.
>
> Oh well, it was a quick and easy one.. so no big deal.. I guess you can
> just ignore my egg.
>
> However, is there somewhere on the wiki I could link to where it
> mentions that SRFI-87 support is in core?
>
> --Sergey
>
> [1] - https://wiki.call-cc.org/supported-standards
The support for `=>' in cond clauses has been added [to CHICKEN 4.9.0]
to conform to R7RS, not exactly to support SRFI-87, as far as I can
tell. It is documented in
http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Module%20scheme#derived-expression-types
(look for the documentation of `case')
All the best.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
- New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, noosphere, 2020/11/20
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2020/11/21
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, noosphere, 2020/11/21
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, Lassi Kortela, 2020/11/21
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses,
Mario Domenech Goulart <=
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, noosphere, 2020/11/21
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2020/11/22
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, John Cowan, 2020/11/22
- Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses, noosphere, 2020/11/22