chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Question about (use numbers)


From: Thomas Chust
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Question about (use numbers)
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:51:03 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

On 2014-03-02 17:20, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> On 2 March 2014 17:00, Matt Gushee <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Does this mean that I am loading the module wrong?
>>> [...] 
>> No. The numbers egg redefines all the standard arithmetic 'operators'
>> [...]
> Ok. Does this also mean that there is no way to suppress these messages
> (without also suppressing a similar message if I accidentally redefine
> something I shouldn't)?
> [...]

Hello,

as far as I know there is no good way to suppress some of these messages
in the interpreter, but when compiling modular code you can use
selective imports, for example adding an (except ...) clause to the
scheme and/or chicken modules for those standard bindings you are later
going to redefine.

Ciao,
Thomas


-- 
When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]