[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?
From: |
Ivan Raikov |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path? |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:46:32 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Actually, I think it would be nice to have a tool that can
automatically create a custom Chicken shared library that only
includes the units that user specifies, and perhaps that can also
statically link eggs to that library. For example, if I want to deploy
a standalone application that does not use the regex and tcp units,
but uses matchable and filepath, this hypothetical tool would be able
to create a Chicken library that includes statically compiled
syntax-case, matchable and filepath, but no regex or tcp units. What
do people think about this?
-Ivan
Peter Bex <address@hidden> writes:
> I think Ivan is not suggesting _adding_ this to core, but rather
> _replacing_ what we have in core with this. In total, this should
> have the net effect of adding nothing (though I don't know how big
> both libraries are).
- [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Matthew Welland, 2008/10/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Peter Bex, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Vincent Manis, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Ivan Raikov, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Peter Bex, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?,
Ivan Raikov <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, felix winkelmann, 2008/10/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Alex Shinn, 2008/10/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, John Cowan, 2008/10/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, John Cowan, 2008/10/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in canonical-path?, Elf, 2008/10/28