[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:37:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Graham Fawcett scripsit:
> Hm, is it just primitive C functions that need better "procedure
> information"? It might be easier to fix that, than to build and
> maintain a database.
Really only the primitives that are also user-exposed, like +
but unlike cons (which is not, technically, a primitive in Chicken).
--
Samuel Johnson on playing the violin: John Cowan
"Difficult do you call it, Sir? address@hidden
I wish it were impossible." http://www.ccil.org/~cowan