[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:18:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Graham Fawcett scripsit:
> It's of less use when the procedure takes variable arguments, though,
Sometimes you get a useful result:
(procedure-information list) => (list . lst120)
And sometimes you don't:
(procedure-information +) => C_plus
--
John Cowan address@hidden http://ccil.org/~cowan
No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the
continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a
manor of thy friends or of thine own were: any man's death diminishes me,
because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for
whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee. --John Donne
- [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?, Mark Fredrickson, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?, Graham Fawcett, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?, Kon Lovett, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?, Graham Fawcett, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?, John Cowan, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?, Kon Lovett, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?, Mark Fredrickson, 2008/01/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?, felix winkelmann, 2008/01/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Runtime arity?, Kon Lovett, 2008/01/31