[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander? |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:57:17 +0100 |
On Dec 21, 2007 4:43 PM, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Chicken is an optimizing batch compiler for the R5RS Scheme language.
> It produces portable, efficient C supporting tail recursion, first-class
> continuations, and lightweight threads. Interfacing to and from C is
> emphasized, including both static and dynamic loading of Chicken code,
> with full support for Posix functions. Chicken's interpreter is not
> strongly performant, but does provide strong debugging facilities.
I'd remove that last sentence above.
> Chicken also has a repository with hundreds of user-contributed "eggs",
> including most SRFIs and many other widely available Scheme libraries.
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/19
- [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Tobia Conforto, 2007/12/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Zbigniew, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Ivan Raikov, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Ivan Raikov, 2007/12/27