[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander? |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:21:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Peter Busser scripsit:
> So what can an optimizing buzzword-compliant batch compiler for the R5RS
> Scheme language do for me to make my life better/easier/more exciting/etc.?
Well, Debian descriptions are meant to describe, not to advertise the
product. I was simply trying to answer the question, "What makes this
Scheme different from all other Schemes?"
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <address@hidden>
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
- [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Robin Lee Powell, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/19
- [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Tobia Conforto, 2007/12/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Zbigniew, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Ivan Raikov, 2007/12/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/27