[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:57:05 +0200 |
On 8/23/07, Arto Bendiken <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I believe this is simply a case of a situation where more of the
> generally useful stuff should be pushed down to Chicken's standard
> library, whence all eggs could rely on that functionality always being
> available (unless compiled out e.g. when installing a very minimal
> Chicken).
Valid point.
>
> Of course, I've no idea if this really is what Felix wants to do with
> Chicken. But it's at least an opportune time to be asking these kinds
> of questions, given the R6RS situation.
I? I don't know anything. I'm just trying not to go under and to keep things
working, somehow. I don't have the time for things like plans... :-)
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, (continued)
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, Benedikt Rosenau, 2007/08/22
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, felix winkelmann, 2007/08/22
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, Arto Bendiken, 2007/08/23
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology,
felix winkelmann <=
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, Peter Keller, 2007/08/23
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, Will M Farr, 2007/08/23
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, felix winkelmann, 2007/08/23
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, John Cowan, 2007/08/23
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, felix winkelmann, 2007/08/23
Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology, Shawn Rutledge, 2007/08/23