|
From: | Sunnan |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology |
Date: | Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:41:10 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) |
Benedikt Rosenau wrote:
I disagree; sometimes, it seems better to split common code to libraries than to have duplication. Dependencies can be hell, but so can duplication.Anyway, I propose the following: please keep dependencies between eggs small.
I guess I can agree with that. If that should happen, here are two solutions to that:Further, no mutual dependencies (A needs B, and B needs A) should be created.
Either:1) create a third package, C, with the stuff from A that B depends on, so that A depends on B and C, and B depends on C, or:
2) join the two packages.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |