[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in sort
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in sort |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:15:42 -0600 |
> There seems to be a bug in 'sort' from textutils-2.0 in how it treats
> non-alphanumeric characters: it ignores them by default when sorting. I
[...]
Your report matches a common pattern. Jim has previously answered
these reports with the following mail. Note that some vendors set
those language variables for you without you being aware of them.
Bob
========================================================================
Jim Meyering writes:
Thanks for the report.
Here's the canned reply:
------------
You are using the version of sort that comes with textutils-2.0
or newer and have reported a problem whereby it is sorting in
some non-ASCII order.
That is due not to a bug in sort, but to the fact that you have
set environment variables that direct sort to use improper locale-
specific tables (you or your vendor have probably set environment
variables like LANG, LC_ALL, or LANGUAGE to en_US).
Unset them, and then set LC_ALL to POSIX
# If you use bash or some other Bourne-based shell,
export LC_ALL=POSIX
# If you use a C-shell,
setenv LC_ALL POSIX
and sort will then work the way you expect.
-----------
BTW, in recent textutils test releases, sort --help output
includes this:
*** WARNING ***
This version of sort honors the locale settings in your environment.
For example, if you set one of the LANG or LC_ALL environment variables
to `en_US', then sort will work very differently than most people expect.
If that's not what you want, then set LC_ALL to POSIX in your environment.
_______________________________________________
Bug-textutils mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-textutils
- Bug in sort, Paddy Doyle \(Sysadmin\), 2001/06/11
- Re: Bug in sort, Paddy Doyle \(Sysadmin\), 2001/06/11
- Re: Bug in sort,
Bob Proulx <=