[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in sort
From: |
Paddy Doyle \(Sysadmin\) |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in sort |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:38:52 +0100 (IST) |
Hi,
Sorry, I don't think I made my point too clear in my last post.
The output that I would have expected would have been something like this:
index.10html
index.11html
index.12html
index-11html
index10html
index11html
index12html
....
Ie, for the strings containing '.' to be grouped together, and so on.
Thanks again,
Paddy
--
Paddy Doyle
Sysadmin, UCD Netsoc
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Paddy Doyle (Sysadmin) wrote:
> Hi,
> There seems to be a bug in 'sort' from textutils-2.0 in how it treats
> non-alphanumeric characters: it ignores them by default when sorting. I
> know there are the -d and -i options to restrict sorting to alphanumeric
> characters, but '-d' seems to be turned on by default.
>
> Here's an example to illustrate:
>
> ~:> cat sortfile
> index.12html
> index18html
> index16html
> index.10html
> index.11html
> index10html
> index-11html
> index/10html
> index10html
> index12html
> index17html
> index11html
> ~:> sort sortfileindex/10html
> index.10html
> index10html
> index10html
> index-11html
> index.11html
> index11html
> index.12html
> index12html
> index16html
> index17html
> index18html
>
>
> Basically it performs the sort based only on the 'index[0-9][0-9]'
> pattern, not taking the ``.-/'' etc into account.
>
> I have tried this both with the RPM of textutils (textutils-2.0-2) and the
> source (textutils-2.0) version.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Paddy
>
> --
> Paddy Doyle
> Sysadmin, UCD Netsoc
>
>
- Bug in sort, Paddy Doyle \(Sysadmin\), 2001/06/11
- Re: Bug in sort,
Paddy Doyle \(Sysadmin\) <=
- Re: Bug in sort, Bob Proulx, 2001/06/11