[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Who's Right ... Parted or NT Disk Admin???
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: Who's Right ... Parted or NT Disk Admin??? |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Jan 2002 08:41:22 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:46:42PM -0500, Sean Cooper wrote:
> I have a machine that triple boots 98SE, Win NT server 4.0, and Redhat 6.2. I
> want to decrease the size of
> the windoze partitions and increase /home and also swap (I added more RAM).
>
> parted says (comments far right in []):
>
> 1 0.31 2047.346 primary FAT boot
> [Win 98]
> 2 2047.346 14668.725 extended
> 6 2047.408 2070.878 logical ext2
> [aka /boot or /dev/hda7]
> 7 2070.910 6338.144 logical ext2
> [aka / or /dev/hda6]
> 8 6338.175 6408.742 logical linux-swap
> [SWAP or /dev/hda8]
> 5 6408.773 8456.088 logical ntfs
> [aka Win NT]
This looks dodgey... the minor number on the left should
match the partition number. i.e. partition 6
should be /dev/hda6, etc.
I just fixed a bug recently that caused this problem, that
seems to only occur when you used RH 6.x's disk druid.
Try parted 1.4.23.
Thanks,
Andrew