[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fat-16
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: fat-16 |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:33:04 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 05:16:25PM +0000, Pavel Bushuk wrote:
> I have a problem with fat-16, and I don't understand what's happening.
> Please someone make things clear for me...
You have a FAT file system that "doesn't make any sense" to Parted
(nor to me!)
> I'm using parted 1.15
Do you mean 1.4.15?
> "parted /dev/hda print" gives......
>
> Disk geometry for /dev/hda: 0.000-12949.453 megabytes
> Disk label type: msdos
> 1 0.031 415.744 primary FAT boot
> 2 2047.346 4047.626 extended
> 5 2047.377 4047.626 logical FAT
>
> and then "parted /dev/hda resize 5 2047.377 3000.000" gives ....
>
> Error: The FATs aren't big enough to describe all clusters! Each FAT is
> 250 sectors.
> There are 63999 clusters, which would require each FAT to be 251
> sectors. This is REALLY
> weird. You might want to write us an email: address@hidden
Could you please run "chkdsk" in Windows, and send in "all the
numbers"?
Thanks,
Andrew
- fat-16, Pavel Bushuk, 2001/07/20
- Re: fat-16,
Andrew Clausen <=