bug-parallel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNU Parallel Bug Reports Signal SIGCHLD received, but no signal hand


From: Rick Masters
Subject: Re: GNU Parallel Bug Reports Signal SIGCHLD received, but no signal handler set
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 22:45:04 +0000


Ole,


I just realized after reading your last email again that you suggested a different source for VM images. I have been using osboxes.org. I will try ones from the sites you suggested and will let you know if I can find one that reproduces the problem more easily.


Rick


From: address@hidden <address@hidden> on behalf of Ole Tange <address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 8:55 AM
To: Rick Masters
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: GNU Parallel Bug Reports Signal SIGCHLD received, but no signal handler set
 
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Rick Masters <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ole,
>
> I was able to repro the underlying perl issue with the Centos 6.8  32 -bit virtual box.
> I used the same perl test but I noticed that it does not repro nearly as often.
> But, I have made it happen repeatedly.

How long does it have to run? I let mine run for 5 full minutes. Is
there anything we can do to make it happen faster?

> BTW, I'm not sure if you wanted me to send you the virtual box image.
> It's gigabytes in size and would only have the two scripts in it (that you already have) so I'm assuming that's not necessary at this point.

If you can use one if the boxes on
https://virtualboxes.org/images/centos/ and just tell me what you have
virtualboxes.org
Images for several CentOS flavours are available. CentOS 5.1 Size (compressed/uncompressed): 620 MBytes / 2.53 GBytes Link: Active user account(s)(username/password): root/roottoor, centos/reverse …


changed, then that should work, too. And if that does not work then I
probably need the exact box you are using.

/Ole

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]