[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch versions [Was: Re: color in subwindows]

From: Thomas Dickey
Subject: Re: patch versions [Was: Re: color in subwindows]
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:15:29 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:09:24PM -0600, D. Stimits wrote:
> Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:20:55PM -0600, D. Stimits wrote:
> >
> >>Apparently this was not a fix. I rebuilt from patch-5.3-20030510.sh,
> >>ncurses-5.3-20030517.patch.gz, ncurses-5.3-20030524.patch.gz,
> >>ncurses-5.3-20030531.patch.gz, ncurses-20030607.patch.gz, and
> >>ncurses-20030614.patch.gz.
> >>
> >>With all of the above patches, it still fails to compile a const
> >>version. I have not figured out yet why this happens, but I am now even
> >
> >
> >I'm not sure what you're looking at, since I do occasionally compile using
> >the --enable-const, and sometimes using g++ as the compiler (the last was
> >during this month).  A copy of config.status and the resulting log would
> >help me see it.
> >...
> Attached are bzip'd config.log and config.status, as taken from the rpm 
> BUILD output during creation of the source and binary rpm's.

Perhaps it's related to the version of gcc.  I'm not on Redhat right now
(I have a workable Redhat 8), so I changed the compiler definitions in
config.status to gcc and g++ (which happens to be gcc 2.95.4), and it
works fine.  I did test-compiles using gcc 3.3 (not on Redhat, since
their ahem install leaves little space.  Perhaps they've tinkered with
the compiler and broken something there.

Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]