[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Noteheads slightly too large
From: |
Paul Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Noteheads slightly too large |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2016 00:05:45 -0500 |
Hi Pierre,
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Some thoughts regarding the use of ly:stencil-scale:
> 1. the command seems to have a side effect on the stem attachment (or
> probably no effect on the note head extents - tested on a W8 OS)
> 2. applying it on all note heads suppose that all glyphs have the same scale
> defects (which is not the case, see my example with the harmonic style).
>
> So here's my attempt to get something liable to all note head styles.
> Unfortunately I did note find any direct procedure to get the 'default style
> ( '() do not work):
Well, I was only intending that code for testing purposes. Looks like you’ve
got a good start on something for actual use.
Cheers,
-Paul
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, (continued)
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Urs Liska, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, tisimst, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Paul Morris, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Gilberto Agostinho, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, tisimst, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large,
Paul Morris <=
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Paul Morris, 2016/02/14
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, tisimst, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, tisimst, 2016/02/10
Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Carl Sorensen, 2016/02/14