[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Noteheads slightly too large
From: |
Gilberto Agostinho |
Subject: |
Re: Noteheads slightly too large |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:55:01 -0700 (MST) |
Hi Paul,
Paul Morris wrote
> Interesting... Here’s some code for experimenting with this. It scales
> notehead stencils. A scaling of 250/276 should make the solid notes equal
> to one staff-space. (Or should it be 275/276 to make it the "distance
> between the bottom of a staff line to the top of the next staff line up”?)
The scaling of the notehead grob in your code indeed solves it, I used the
same resolution and zoom level as in the last png I posted and the notehead
is properly contained by the staves.
Cheers,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Noteheads-slightly-too-large-tp184659p187047.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/08
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Gilberto Agostinho, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Urs Liska, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, tisimst, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Paul Morris, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large,
Gilberto Agostinho <=
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, tisimst, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Paul Morris, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Paul Morris, 2016/02/14
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/09
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, tisimst, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/02/10
- Re: Noteheads slightly too large, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/10