Re: The utter impossibility of building a devel version RPM

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Daniel Jensen <address@hidden> writes:

> Is libgr-progs still necessary? Or does Lilypond work equally well with 
> netpbm and netpbm-progs? That seems to be the case

Yes, most probably, we're using those on Debian.

> I haven't seen a tetex-devel package in ages, BTW. Tetex-devel seems to 
> all have been incorporated either into the tetex distribution itself or 
> into some of the packages usually installed along with tetex.

Maybe this is now called libkpathsea(-dev)?

What about Guile?  Mandrake has now three packages, so is seems.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org